A Narcissist will (attempt to) “kill the former king/queen” before moving on.

Amber Heard did it to Johnny Depp quite famously. I believe it was done to Charles Manson, and a number of other people in #meToo era: To destroy the old crush, or, as I say, Kill the former King before moving onto serving another. If the “Former King” rejected the narcissist or made it impossible for them to hold onto their lies, they may believe the requirement is to “kill the former king,” and by killing them, I mean reputation destruction. This is also far more typical for female narcissists to do than male ones, who may try some of it, perhaps by confessing “hating” the ex, or spreading revenge porn on them.

This is a very narcissistic-typical reaction, to punish the ex so they can move on. Cat Thinkers will usually speak about their “secrets” freely with every new person, but a narcissist will think he or she is giving them a bucket load of collateral information, guarantees: “You can trust me, if I betray you, this is the info you can punish me with.” A Cat Thinker is not doing that for that reason tho. They’re simply having a chat. So when the “secrets” turn out to be not secrets at all, the narcissist (Dog Thinker) feels enraged and comes up with shit of their own.

The narcissist will not consider it a “good kill” unless they have utilized underhanded methods and gloriously betrayed the former king. This is one of the reasons the narcissists may think you’re still in love with them if you haven’t gloriously and publicly betrayed them yet. Ironically, they try to kill their ex’s lingering feelings, I guess, even when the ex has none left.

The moral of the story is to take an ex’s words with a grain of salt when they spread rumors about their ex. It may be completely false. Then again, the ex may be “the former king,” so, again, the question is, who is who?

For this reason, I believe NOTHING before I see some solid evidence. Weinstein, Epstein,  Shitstein, I don’t care, give me the receipts.